Re: [PATCH v10 0/3]

2019-04-30 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Nickolai, On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Nickolai Belakovski wrote: > Sorry, I'm not very accustomed to mailing list development. I had assumed > that this was being threaded with the other messages in the series, hence > leaving the subject blank and only putting new info in the body. The openness of

Re: [PATCH v10 0/3]

2019-04-29 Thread Nickolai Belakovski
Sorry, I'm not very accustomed to mailing list development. I had assumed that this was being threaded with the other messages in the series, hence leaving the subject blank and only putting new info in the body. In the future I'll add in an appropriate subject and brief re-hash in the body. Thank

Re: [PATCH v10 0/3]

2019-04-29 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, am I the only person who is puzzled every time this patch series with a completely empty subject and without any further explanation about the intent in the mail body is sent? Ciao, Johannes On Sun, 28 Apr 2019, nbelakov...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Nickolai Belakovski > > Added test_i18nc

Re: [PATCH v10 0/3]

2019-04-29 Thread Nickolai Belakovski
> Testing with GETTEXT_POISON was broken since 6cdccfce (i18n: make > GETTEXT_POISON a runtime option, 2018-11-08), and didn't catch any of > these issues. See: > > > https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqlg0bvppc.fsf...@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/T/#u > > The fix f88b9cb603 (gettext tests: export th

Re: [PATCH v10 0/3]

2019-04-29 Thread SZEDER Gábor
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:19:41PM -0700, nbelakov...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Nickolai Belakovski > > Added test_i18ncmp per instructions from Szeder > > Is there some other part of the infrastructure that's testing for this? > Because it did not fail in any of my Travis CI builds. > > Travis