On 4/24/2018 7:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ben Peart writes:
That said, it makes sense to me to do
this when rename detection is turned off. In fact, I think you'd
automatically want to set aggressive to true whenever rename detection
is turned off (whether by your merge.renames option or
Ben Peart writes:
> That said, it makes sense to me to do
>> this when rename detection is turned off. In fact, I think you'd
>> automatically want to set aggressive to true whenever rename detection
>> is turned off (whether by your merge.renames option or the
>> -Xno-renames flag).
>> ...
>
>
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
> On 4/20/2018 1:22 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Ben Peart
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add the ability to control the aggressive flag passed to read-tree via a
>>> config setting.
>>
>> This feels like a workaround t
On 4/20/2018 1:22 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
Add the ability to control the aggressive flag passed to read-tree via a config
setting.
This feels like a workaround to the performance problems with index
updates in merge-recursive.c.
This c
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
> Add the ability to control the aggressive flag passed to read-tree via a
> config setting.
This feels like a workaround to the performance problems with index
updates in merge-recursive.c. That said, it makes sense to me to do
this when rename
5 matches
Mail list logo
