Junio C Hamano writes:
> So here is the first of the two small/trivial patch series.
>
> To prepare the first one, I did "git grep -e '\ result of applying Stepan's series and edited the hits manually.
> And then compared the result with running
>
> $ perl -p -i -e 'if (!/\btest_set_prereq\s/)
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Oh by the way, can somebody remind me why we spell these as
>> NOT_MINGW, instead of !MINGW?
>
> Simple answer seems to be that !ANYTHING appeared only at bdccd3c1
> (test-lib: allow negation of prerequisites, 2012-11-14) but at that
> versio
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Oh by the way, can somebody remind me why we spell these as
> NOT_MINGW, instead of !MINGW?
Simple answer seems to be that !ANYTHING appeared only at bdccd3c1
(test-lib: allow negation of prerequisites, 2012-11-14) but at that
version already 5 test files use NOT_MINGW
Am 21.07.2014 19:45, schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Oh by the way, can somebody remind me why we spell these as
>> NOT_MINGW, instead of !MINGW?
>
> I guess that is my mistake; when I introduced the use of NOT_MINGW I was
> simply un
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Oh by the way, can somebody remind me why we spell these as
> NOT_MINGW, instead of !MINGW?
I guess that is my mistake; when I introduced the use of NOT_MINGW I was
simply unaware of the !MINGW syntax.
Let's use the latter consistently?
C
Erik Faye-Lund writes:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Stepan Kasal wrote:
>> From: Pat Thoyts
>>
>> On Windows the application command line is provided as unicode and in
>> mingw-git we convert that to utf-8. So these tests that require a iso-8859-1
>> input are being subverted by the encod
6 matches
Mail list logo
