On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:13:55AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> + -x)
> + test_eval_start_='set -x'
> [...]
> + eval "$test_eval_start_ $*"
> +}
Hmph. I had originally intended to make this "set -x;" with a semicolon,
to keep it split from $*. But I forgot to, and much to my surp
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:13:55AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Having finally figured out how to drop the "set +x" from the output, I
> have noticed that I kind of liked the "test_eval_ret=$?" part of the
> trace (which is now gone, too), because it pretty explicitly tells you
> that the last traced
2 matches
Mail list logo