Jeff King writes:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:50:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> it first looked somewhat unnatural that you kept the name with which
>> you need to trigger a search for the structure, instead of keeping
>> the structure, one of whose field is its name already.
> ...
> Tha
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:50:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Getting rid of it drops one potential source of confusion:
> > is the value the match for "remote_name", or is it the
> > remote we would fetch from when on that branch (i.e., does
> > it fall back to "origin")?
>
> I had to read
Jeff King writes:
> When we create each branch struct, we fill in the
> "remote_name" field from the config, and then fill in the
> actual "remote" field based on that name. However, it turns
> out that nobody really cares about this field. The only two
> sites that access it are:
>
> 1. git-me
3 matches
Mail list logo
