On 2016-01-31 01.01, Eric Wong wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> On 2016-01-30 14.13, Eric Wong wrote:
>>> The ssh(1) command has an equivalent switches which we may
>>> pass when we run them.
>
>> Should we mention that putty and tortoiseplink don't have these options ?
>> At least in the
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:01:44AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > --- a/builtin/clone.c
> > > +++ b/builtin/clone.c
> > > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static const char *real_git_dir;
> > > static char *option_upload_pack = "git-upload-pack";
> > > static int option_verbosity;
> > > static int option_progr
Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2016-01-30 14.13, Eric Wong wrote:
> > The ssh(1) command has an equivalent switches which we may
> > pass when we run them.
> Should we mention that putty and tortoiseplink don't have these options ?
> At least in the commit message ?
Sure, will remember for v2
On 2016-01-30 14.13, Eric Wong wrote:
Nicely done, some minor questions inline.
> Sometimes, it is necessary to force IPv4-only or IPv6-only
> operation on networks where name lookups may return a
> non-routable address and stall remote operations.
>
> The ssh(1) command has an equivalent switches
Eric Wong wrote:
> rsync support is untouched for now since it is deprecated
> and scheduled to be removed.
I forgot add I'm not sure how to actually go about testing these changes
automatically since they involve DNS setups. And the test suite seems
really slow nowadays, I guess/hope our test c
5 matches
Mail list logo
