Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior

2013-01-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > Thanks. No matter how many times I proofread a doc change, I always > manage to slip an error into the final version. I think everybody shares that trait. > Hooray for many eyes. Indeed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a mess

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior

2013-01-31 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:37:01PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Sunshine writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Jeff King wrote: > >> +If `--list` is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing > >> +branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted with an

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior

2013-01-31 Thread Junio C Hamano
Eric Sunshine writes: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Jeff King wrote: >> +If `--list` is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing >> +branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted with an >> +asterisk. Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking branches to be liste

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior

2013-01-31 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Jeff King wrote: > +If `--list` is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing > +branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted with an > +asterisk. Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking branches to be listed, > +and option `-a` shows b