Junio C Hamano wrote:
> We may want to see it done the other way around, though. That is,
> to allow the pack-refs race fix, which was reviewed and has been
> cooking, graduate without having to depend on this API rewrite, so
> that we may be able to merge it down even to v2.2.x maintenance
> tra
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I tried to merge the 14-patch series with obvious fix-ups after
>> dropping the rerere abortion change you sent separately and in
>> duplicate and also dropping sb/copy-fd, but I've ran out of patience
>> with this step, at least for today's in
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:29:51PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > I tried to merge the 14-patch series with obvious fix-ups after
> > dropping the rerere abortion change you sent separately and in
> > duplicate and also dropping sb/copy-fd, but I've ran out of patienc
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I was under the impression that the purpose of the series was to
> propose an API update to be used together with the remainder of the
> system, not just "update code in master, breaking unstated set of
> topics and leaving them behind without updating them for now".
Got i
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
>>> The 14-patch series may have been internally consistent and its
>>> individual patches, when each of them was taken alone by itself, may
>>> have made sense, but it appears that the aggregated whole these
>>> separate topics took their root
Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> The 14-patch series may have been internally consistent and its
>> individual patches, when each of them was taken alone by itself, may
>> have made sense, but it appears that the aggregated whole these
>> separate topics took their root from is inconsistent with itself
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I tried to merge the 14-patch series with obvious fix-ups after
> dropping the rerere abortion change you sent separately and in
> duplicate and also dropping sb/copy-fd, but I've ran out of patience
> with this step, at least for today's integration cycle. Should we
> als
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
>> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
>> index 917f8fc..39e43cf 100644
>> --- a/refs.c
>> +++ b/refs.c
>> @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char
>> *refname,
>> */
>> go
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
>> index 917f8fc..39e43cf 100644
>> --- a/refs.c
>> +++ b/refs.c
>> @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char
>> *refname,
>> */
>> goto r
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index 917f8fc..39e43cf 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char
> *refname,
>*/
> goto retry;
> else
> -
10 matches
Mail list logo
