Our cumbersome mailing list workflow (was: Re: [PATCH 0/6] repack_without_refs(): convert to string_list)

2014-11-24 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 11/21/2014 07:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty writes: > >> I don't think that those iterations changed anything substantial that >> overlaps with my version, but TBH it's such a pain in the ass working >> with patches in email that I don't think I'll go to the effort of >> chec

Re: [PATCH 0/6] repack_without_refs(): convert to string_list

2014-11-21 Thread Stefan Beller
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Haggerty writes: > >> I don't think that those iterations changed anything substantial that >> overlaps with my version, but TBH it's such a pain in the ass working >> with patches in email that I don't think I'll go to the effort

Re: [PATCH 0/6] repack_without_refs(): convert to string_list

2014-11-21 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty writes: > I don't think that those iterations changed anything substantial that > overlaps with my version, but TBH it's such a pain in the ass working > with patches in email that I don't think I'll go to the effort of > checking for sure unless somebody shows interest in actual

Re: [PATCH 0/6] repack_without_refs(): convert to string_list

2014-11-21 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 11/21/2014 03:09 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > This is basically an atomized version of Ronnie/Jonathan/Stefan's > patch [1] "refs.c: use a stringlist for repack_without_refs". But I've > actually rewritten most of it from scratch, using the original patch > as a reference. Naturally, right aft