Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bits from git-pb

2005-07-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have not answered this because I have not made up my mind. > Certainly (iii) is probably the least work for me. Certainly? Probably? Which one? I should not start typing before having a cup of coffee. **BLUSH** Anyway, yes I would appreciate if

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bits from git-pb

2005-07-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> (iii) Do wild things in the git-pb branch and send you patches. > > So I assume (iii) holds? I have not answered this because I have not made up my mind. Certainly (iii) is probably the least work for me. My gut feeling is that I can deal with any of

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bits from git-pb

2005-07-30 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:58:19AM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > (i) Keep the git-pb branch polished and nice-to-merge, if you want to > pull from it. > > (ii) Keep the git-pb branch polished and nice-to-merge and rebase it > regularil