Johannes Sixt writes:
> We might wonder why our && chain check does not catch this case:
> The && chain check uses a strange exit code with the expectation that
> the second or later part of a broken && chain would not exit with this
> particular code.
>
> This expectation does not work in this c
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:00:47PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> We might wonder why our && chain check does not catch this case:
> The && chain check uses a strange exit code with the expectation that
> the second or later part of a broken && chain would not exit with this
> particular code.
>
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
