On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:51:33AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> But I did find Ævar's forgotten gitperformance doc and thread
> where the topic was brought up:
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20170403211644.26814-1-ava...@gmail.com/
One thing that thread reminded me of: we probably also want to
Jeff King wrote:
> OK. I still think of bitmaps as something that might need manual care
> and feeding, but I think that may be leftover superstition. I can't
> offhand think of any real downsides to this.
It's a _relatively_ new feature to long-time users like us, so
maybe the "new == immature"
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 06:49:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I'm not sure what we're trying to accomplish with this unpacking,
> though. Running "git repack -ad" should generate bitmaps whether the
> objects were already in a single pack or not. So I think this test can
> just be:
>
> git clone
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 03:13:03AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > I do think they're a net win for people hosting git servers. But if
> > that's the goal, I think at most you'd want to make bitmaps the default
> > for bare repos. They're really not much help for normal end-user repos
> > at this poin
On Tue, Mar 12 2019, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 02:49:44AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
>> > It would make life easier for people new to hosting git servers
>> > (and hopefully reduce centralization :)
>>
>> I do think they're a net win for people hosting git serv
5 matches
Mail list logo
