On 7 May 2018 at 09:39, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. This looks good to me. But it it seems that the
> test coverage related to pseudorefs is still not great. Ideally, all of
> the following combinations should be tested:
>
> Pre-update value | ref-update old OID | Expected
On 05/06/2018 03:35 PM, Martin Ågren wrote:
> According to the documentation on `git update-ref`, it is possible to
> "specify 40 '0' or an empty string as to make sure that the
> ref you are creating does not exist." But in the code for pseudorefs, we
> do not implement this. If we fail to read t
LGTM.
(This is the current best address to reach me, but do not expect fast
responses over the next few days as I'm out of town)
On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 15:35 +0200, Martin Ågren wrote:
> According to the documentation on `git update-ref`, it is possible to
> "specify 40 '0' or an empty string
3 matches
Mail list logo