Re: [PATCH] reachable: only mark local objects as recent

Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:00:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Jeff King writes: >> >> > It is possible that we may drop an object that is depended >> > upon by another object in the alternate. For example, >> > imagine two repositories, A and B, with A pointing to B a

Re: [PATCH] reachable: only mark local objects as recent

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:00:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > It is possible that we may drop an object that is depended > > upon by another object in the alternate. For example, > > imagine two repositories, A and B, with A pointing to B as > > an alternate. Now imag

Re: [PATCH] reachable: only mark local objects as recent

Jeff King writes: > It is possible that we may drop an object that is depended > upon by another object in the alternate. For example, > imagine two repositories, A and B, with A pointing to B as > an alternate. Now imagine a commit that is in B which > references a tree that is only in A. Traver