On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:16:47PM +0100, Maurice Bos wrote:
> I have no clue why git diff --cached isn't used instead of git diff-index.
> I was wondering about it, but I decided I don't know enough about git and
> there are probably valid reasons for doing it this way. Though, replacing
> it wit
I have no clue why git diff --cached isn't used instead of git
diff-index. I was wondering about it, but I decided I don't know
enough about git and there are probably valid reasons for doing it
this way. Though, replacing it with with git diff --cached seems to
have the exact same behaviour, as fa
2 matches
Mail list logo
