On 9/26/2019 11:24 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
> On 26/09/2019 14:36, Derrick Stolee wrote:
Another good reason to use "sizeof(var)" instead of sizeof(type)". :)
>>> That is indeed a very good reason, in addition to getting the type right
>>> automatically (by virtue of letting the compiler pick
On 26/09/2019 14:36, Derrick Stolee wrote:
Another good reason to use "sizeof(var)" instead of sizeof(type)". :)
That is indeed a very good reason, in addition to getting the type right
automatically (by virtue of letting the compiler pick it).
Should we make this an explicit guideline in our d
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:36:44AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 9/26/2019 9:22 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Hi Peff,
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Sep 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:48:30PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> >>
> >>> Use the macro COPY_ARRAY to copy array el
On 9/26/2019 9:22 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Peff,
>
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:48:30PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>>
>>> Use the macro COPY_ARRAY to copy array elements and MOVE_ARRAY to do the
>>> same for moving them backwards in an array w
Hi Peff,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:48:30PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>
> > Use the macro COPY_ARRAY to copy array elements and MOVE_ARRAY to do the
> > same for moving them backwards in an array with potential overlap. The
> > result is shorter and safer
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:48:30PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Use the macro COPY_ARRAY to copy array elements and MOVE_ARRAY to do the
> same for moving them backwards in an array with potential overlap. The
> result is shorter and safer, as it infers the element type automatically
> and does a
6 matches
Mail list logo