On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
+action = "noop" / "ls-remote" / "fetch" / "push" /
"fetch-shallow"
>> ...
>>> If we are going in this "in-protocol message switches the service"
>>> route, we should also support "archive" as on
Stefan Beller writes:
>>> +action = "noop" / "ls-remote" / "fetch" / "push" /
>>> "fetch-shallow"
> ...
>> If we are going in this "in-protocol message switches the service"
>> route, we should also support "archive" as one of the actions, no?
>> Yes, I know you named the document "pac
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
>> It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
>> squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
>> between versio
Stefan Beller writes:
> This adds the design document for protocol version 2.
> It's better to rewrite the design document instead of trying to
> squash it into the existing pack-protocol.txt and then differentiating
> between version 1 and 2 all the time.
Just a handful of random thoughts, with
4 matches
Mail list logo
