On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> I would be interested in the code for this.. I'm curious if I can
>> adapt it to my use of tmux.
>
> I stumbled upon this which does mention about git SHA-1. Maybe you'll
> find it useful.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> I would be interested in the code for this.. I'm curious if I can
> adapt it to my use of tmux.
I stumbled upon this which does mention about git SHA-1. Maybe you'll
find it useful. Haven't tried it out though.
https://github.com/morantron/t
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:44:05PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> You just gave me a reason to rebuild urxvt with perl support. It
> solves my problem with SHA-1 nicely (and fixes another problem with
> very large counter in my approach, when you scroll git-log further
> down, because I can't know wha
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:16:15AM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
>
>> > I recently taught urxvt to recognize sha1s and grab them via keyboard
>> > hints, and I'm finding it quite useful. Here's what it looks like if
>> > you're interested:
>> >
>> >
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:16:15AM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
> > I recently taught urxvt to recognize sha1s and grab them via keyboard
> > hints, and I'm finding it quite useful. Here's what it looks like if
> > you're interested:
> >
> > http://peff.net/git-hints.gif
> >
> > The hints techniqu
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:22:49PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> OK This patch is horrible. Though the idea is cool and I've found it
>> very useful. So here it is. Perhaps the idea may be revised a bit
>> that's more suitable for more
Jeff King writes:
> Not really a comment on your patch itself, but I think a lot of people
> solve this at a higher level, either in their terminal or via a tool
> like tmux.
>
> I recently taught urxvt to recognize sha1s and grab them via keyboard
> hints, and I'm finding it quite useful. Here's
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:22:49PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> OK This patch is horrible. Though the idea is cool and I've found it
> very useful. So here it is. Perhaps the idea may be revised a bit
> that's more suitable for more than one user.
>
> The problem is old, SHA-1 name is not
Hi Duy,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > Why not introduce a flag to "git log" that shows a keyboard-friendly name
> > similar to what `git name-rev` would have said, except that the name would
> > be generated using the n
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Why not introduce a flag to "git log" that shows a keyboard-friendly name
> similar to what `git name-rev` would have said, except that the name would
> be generated using the name(s) specified on the command-line?
>
> Example:
>
>
Hi Duy,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> OK This patch is horrible.
Yeah ;-)
> Though the idea is cool and I've found it very useful. So here it is.
> Perhaps the idea may be revised a bit that's more suitable for more than
> one user.
Why not introduce a flag to "git log" th
11 matches
Mail list logo
