Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-26 Thread Prathamesh Chavan
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Andrew Ardill wrote: > On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: > >>But as communicating between child_process is still an issue >>and so there was no simple was to current carry out the >>porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But afte

Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-19 Thread Brandon Williams
On 06/20, Andrew Ardill wrote: > On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: > > >But as communicating between child_process is still an issue > >and so there was no simple was to current carry out the > >porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But after > >discussing

Re: [GSoC] Update: Week 5

2017-06-19 Thread Andrew Ardill
On 20 June 2017 at 07:41, Prathamesh Chavan wrote: >But as communicating between child_process is still an issue >and so there was no simple was to current carry out the >porting. And hence, a hack was used instead. But after >discussing it, instead using the repository-object pat