Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-28 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:42:10AM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> A separate mailing list sounds like a very good idea to me! > >> Maybe "git-bui...@vger.kernel.org" or something? > >> What would it take to set something up like this? > > > > I suspect that emailing the vger admins is the righ

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-28 Thread Lars Schneider
> On 25 Apr 2017, at 12:01, Jeff King wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:51:20AM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote: > Off topic, is it possible to receive mail notifications from Travis when a fault is found in either 'pu', 'next' or 'master'? I know how to do it in Jenkins, but I'm

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-25 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:51:20AM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> Off topic, is it possible to receive mail notifications from Travis > >> when a fault is found in either 'pu', 'next' or 'master'? I know how > >> to do it in Jenkins, but I'm not familiar with Travis and there's no > >> obvious

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-25 Thread Lars Schneider
> On 24 Apr 2017, at 22:37, Jeff King wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:22:36PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > >> Off topic, is it possible to receive mail notifications from Travis >> when a fault is found in either 'pu', 'next' or 'master'? I know how >> to do it in Jenkins, but I'm not famil

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-24 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:22:36PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: > Off topic, is it possible to receive mail notifications from Travis > when a fault is found in either 'pu', 'next' or 'master'? I know how > to do it in Jenkins, but I'm not familiar with Travis and there's no > obvious button from the

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-24 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> Am 20.04.2017 um 23:58 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason : >> >> As a refresh of everyone's memory (because mine needed it). This is a >> feature I added back in 2011 when the i18n support was initially >> added. >> >> There was concern at

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-23 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael J Gruber writes: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason venit, vidit, dixit 20.04.2017 23:58: >> As a refresh of everyone's memory (because mine needed it). This is a >> feature I added back in 2011 when the i18n support was initially >> added. >> >> There was concern at the time that we would inadve

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-21 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason venit, vidit, dixit 20.04.2017 23:58: >> As a refresh of everyone's memory (because mine needed it). This is a >> feature I added back in 2011 when the i18n support was initially >> added. >> >> There was concern at

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-21 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> Am 20.04.2017 um 23:58 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason : >> >> As a refresh of everyone's memory (because mine needed it). This is a >> feature I added back in 2011 when the i18n support was initially >> added. >> >> There was concern at

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-21 Thread Michael J Gruber
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason venit, vidit, dixit 20.04.2017 23:58: > As a refresh of everyone's memory (because mine needed it). This is a > feature I added back in 2011 when the i18n support was initially > added. > > There was concern at the time that we would inadvertently mark > plumbing messages f

Re: [BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease

2017-04-21 Thread Lars Schneider
> Am 20.04.2017 um 23:58 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason : > > As a refresh of everyone's memory (because mine needed it). This is a > feature I added back in 2011 when the i18n support was initially > added. > > There was concern at the time that we would inadvertently mark > plumbing messages