RE: [Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread Randall S. Becker
On June 13, 2019 3:31 PM, I wrote: > On June 13, 2019 3:07 PM, Peff wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:08PM -0400, randall.s.bec...@rogers.com > > wrote: > > > > > From: "Randall S. Becker" > > > > > > t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, > > > otherwise all of those

RE: [Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread Randall S. Becker
On June 13, 2019 3:07 PM, Peff wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:08PM -0400, randall.s.bec...@rogers.com > wrote: > > > From: "Randall S. Becker" > > > > t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, > > otherwise all of those tests fail. This patch follows an existing > > pa

Re: [Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:08PM -0400, randall.s.bec...@rogers.com wrote: > From: "Randall S. Becker" > > t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, otherwise > all of those tests fail. This patch follows an existing pattern of > from the t9400 series by attempting to run c