> -Original Message-
> From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org On Behalf Of
> Stefan Beller
> Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 4:59 PM
> To: Duy Nguyen
> Cc: Jameson Miller ; git@vger.kernel.org;
> gits...@pobox.com; jonathanta...@google.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] All
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> To me it is also a clear yes when it comes to combining these
>> two memory pools.
>
> I also did not notice that jm/mem-pool already landed in master.
Oh, thanks for telling! Now that I look at it, I am doubting it;
The reason for my doubt
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Jameson Miller wrote:
>>> This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
>>> reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index fro
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Jameson Miller wrote:
>> This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
>> reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is
>> partly dominated by the time in malloc(), whic
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Jameson Miller wrote:
> This patch series improves the performance of loading indexes by
> reducing the number of malloc() calls. Loading the index from disk is
> partly dominated by the time in malloc(), which is called for each
> index entry. This patch series re
5 matches
Mail list logo
