Re: KDevelop developers obviously don't use git :(

2017-09-21 Thread Daniel Santos
On 09/21/2017 11:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Daniel Santos writes: > >> So first I need to inquire if there is a current mechanism to say "git >> status, but please fail if you're busy with a non-atomic operation". > Reading this list sometimes makes me wonder if there is some higher > intellig

Re: KDevelop developers obviously don't use git :(

2017-09-21 Thread Junio C Hamano
Daniel Santos writes: > So first I need to inquire if there is a current mechanism to say "git > status, but please fail if you're busy with a non-atomic operation". Reading this list sometimes makes me wonder if there is some higher intelligence telling independent souls to come up with the sam

Re: KDevelop developers obviously don't use git :(

2017-09-21 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:03:53PM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote: > So first I need to inquire if there is a current mechanism to say "git > status, but please fail if you're busy with a non-atomic operation".  If > there is not one, then it would seem that there should be and how do I > go about req

KDevelop developers obviously don't use git :(

2017-09-21 Thread Daniel Santos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219 $ git push minor-rant-warning KDevelop has a despicable habit of performing `git status --porcelain` whenever it damn well pleases ... or rather when it sees an alteration.  This this breaks git rebase because it grabs the $*()&@#$ lock file, often lead