> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - When merging two trees, i.e. "read-tree -m A B", shouldn't
>> we collapse identical stage-1/2 into stage-0?
LT> How do you actually intend to merge two trees?
How silly of me. *BLUSH*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I am wondering if you have a particular reason not to do the
> same for the removing half.
No. Except for me being silly.
Please just make it so.
> Also do you have any comments on this one from the same message?
>
> * read-tree
>
>- When
Linus,
earlier I wrote [*R1*]:
- An explicit "update-cache [--add] [--remove] path" should
be taken as a signal from the user (or Cogito) to tell the
dircache layer "the merge is done and here is the result".
So just delete higher-order stages for the path and record
th
> "JCH" == Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCH> So what's next?
Here is my current thinking on the impact your higher-order
stage dircache entries would have to the rest of the system and
how to deal with them.
* read-tree
- When merging two trees, i.e. "read-tree -m A B", sh
4 matches
Mail list logo
