Re: Inconsistencies in commit-graph technical docs.

Thanks for the quick response and for the patch. I started writing such a long process document because I _thought_ that I found a major issue with the Large Edge List. But, in the end, it was user error. It turned out that I was looking at index '11' when I should have been looking at index '0x11

Re: Inconsistencies in commit-graph technical docs.

On 6/28/2018 1:11 AM, Grant Welch wrote: I recently read the "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph blog by Derrick Stolee. I found the article interesting and wanted to verify the performance numbers for myself. Then that led me to want to know more about the implementation, so I read the technical

Inconsistencies in commit-graph technical docs.

I recently read the "Supercharging the Git Commit Graph" blog by Derrick Stolee. I found the article interesting and wanted to verify the performance numbers for myself. Then that led me to want to know more about the implementation, so I read the technical design notes in commit-graph.txt, and the