Brandon Williams writes:
> On 03/26, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
[...]
>> All of these cases could be eliminated if the type/size were available
>> in the OID.
>>
>> Just a thought. While we are converting to a new hash it seems like
>> this would be a good time to at least discuss it.
>
> Echoing wh
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> This implies a limit on the object size (e.g. 5 bytes in your
> example). What happens when someone wants to encode an object larger
> than that limit?
>
> This also decreases the number of bits available for the hash, but
> that shouldn't be a big issue.
I actually th
On 3/26/2018 5:00 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
[long quote snipped]
While we are converting to a new hash function, it would be nice
if we could add a couple of fields to the end of the OID: the object
type and the raw uncompressed object size.
If would be nice if we cou
On Mon, Mar 26 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Ævar,
>
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> It occurred to me recently that once we have such a layer it could be
>> (ab)used with some relatively minor changes to do any arbitrary
>> local-to-remote object content translation, unless I've missed
(administrivia: please omit parts of the text you are replying to that
are not relevant to the reply. This makes it easier to see what you're
replying to, especially in mail readers that don't hide quoted text by
the default)
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Hostetler wrote:
[long quote snipped]
> While we are
Hi Ævar,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> It occurred to me recently that once we have such a layer it could be
> (ab)used with some relatively minor changes to do any arbitrary
> local-to-remote object content translation, unless I've missed something
> (but I just re-read hash-function-transiti
On 3/26/2018 1:56 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:33 AM Jeff Hostetler
wrote:
On 3/25/2018 6:58 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver wrote:
New hash (Stefan, etc)
--
- discussed on the mailing list
- actual
On 03/26, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
>
>
> On 3/25/2018 6:58 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> >
> > > New hash (Stefan, etc)
> > > --
> > > - discussed on the mailing list
> > > - actual plan checked in to
> > > Documenta
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:33 AM Jeff Hostetler
wrote:
> On 3/25/2018 6:58 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> >
> >> New hash (Stefan, etc)
> >> --
> >> - discussed on the mailing list
> >> - actual plan checked in to
D
On 3/25/2018 6:58 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver wrote:
New hash (Stefan, etc)
--
- discussed on the mailing list
- actual plan checked in to
Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition.txt
- lots of work renaming
- any
On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> New hash (Stefan, etc)
> --
> - discussed on the mailing list
> - actual plan checked in to
> Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition.txt
> - lots of work renaming
> - any actual work with the transition plan?
> - loca
On 03/12, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 02:01:14PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> > > - (peff) Time to deprecate the git anonymous protocol?
> > [...]
> >
> > I think the conclusion was that nobody cares about the git:// protocol,
> > but people do care about it being sup
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 02:01:14PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > - (peff) Time to deprecate the git anonymous protocol?
> [...]
>
> I think the conclusion was that nobody cares about the git:// protocol,
> but people do care about it being super easy to spin up a server, and
> curren
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:06:18PM -0800, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> It was great to meet some of you in person! Some notes from the
> Contributor Summit at Git Merge are below. Taken in haste, so
> my apologies if there are any mis-statements.
Thanks very much for these notes!
I think in future y
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver jotted:
>
>> It was great to meet some of you in person! Some notes from the
>> Contributor Summit at Git Merge are below. Taken in haste, so
>> my apologies if there are any mis-statements.
>
> Thanks a lot for taking these n
On Sat, Mar 10 2018, Alex Vandiver jotted:
> It was great to meet some of you in person! Some notes from the
> Contributor Summit at Git Merge are below. Taken in haste, so
> my apologies if there are any mis-statements.
Thanks a lot for taking these notes. I've read them over and they're all
It was great to meet some of you in person! Some notes from the
Contributor Summit at Git Merge are below. Taken in haste, so
my apologies if there are any mis-statements.
- Alex
"Does anyone think there's a compellin
17 matches
Mail list logo
