Re: GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work

2016-01-31 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Johannes Schindelin" Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:16 AM Hi Philip, On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Philip Oakley wrote: From: "Junio C Hamano" > Jonathan Smith writes: > > > It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't > > considered a derived work of Git, regardless of wh

Re: GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work

2016-01-28 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Philip, On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Junio C Hamano" > > Jonathan Smith writes: > > > > > It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't > > > considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used > > > in a commercial context or otherwise. >

Re: GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work

2016-01-27 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Junio C Hamano" Jonathan Smith writes: It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used in a commercial context or otherwise. I'm guessing here, but I suspect that while its 'pretty clear' to Jonathan, th

Re: GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work

2016-01-25 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Smith writes: > It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't > considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used > in a commercial context or otherwise. > > However, I'm unable to find this stated in any authoritative and > unambiguous manner. Is it reas

GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work

2016-01-24 Thread Jonathan Smith
Hi all It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used in a commercial context or otherwise. However, I'm unable to find this stated in any authoritative and unambiguous manner. For example, http://www.sitepoint.c