On 2012.7.24 10:54 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> And again, it *does not have to be zero sum*. It doesn't have to be email VS
>> GUI. You can have your cake and eat it too.
>
> I assume you're talking about web-based interfaces that have gateways
> to email, that produce inboxes like this:
>
>
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> And again, it *does not have to be zero sum*. It doesn't have to be email VS
> GUI. You can have your cake and eat it too.
I assume you're talking about web-based interfaces that have gateways
to email, that produce inboxes like this:
24 Jul 02:46 GitHub [github]
On 2012.7.24 7:55 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
>> After I'm exhausted from volunteering all the coding work, rather than
>> submitting a URL to a remote repository I find I have to learn new
>> specialized
>> tools. It's extra learning and work, an extra step to screw up, and foreign
>> to me (even as a
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On 2012.7.17 10:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > By allowing people to easily publish a completed work, and making it
> > easier for them to let others peek at their work, Git hosting
> > services like GitHub are wonderful. But I am not conviced that
> > quality code re
Hi,
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> But since you brought Github up... (I get the impression its kind of a dirty
> word around here)
On the contrary, one of the main contributors is employed by github,
github hosts the git website, and all in all, github has done great
work.
Many people on the git l
On 2012.7.17 10:49 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> By allowing people to easily publish a completed work, and making it
> easier for them to let others peek at their work, Git hosting
> services like GitHub are wonderful. But I am not conviced that
> quality code reviews like we do on the mailing list
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> There may be a hosting site with better code review features, but
> all the code review of Git happens on this mailing list, and that is
> not likely to change in the near future.
>
For me, you know, it's codereview, aka rietveld. [1]
[1] c
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> The mailing list archive at
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git might be
> useful for seeing some examples of how it plays out in practice.
By allowing people to easily publish a completed work, and making it
easier for them to let others peek at thei
Hi,
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> There's five classes, so this is ten patches. Let me go on record again to
> state that this one-inline-patch-per-email is a lot of busy work for me.
Well, there's no need to protest and go along with it if it's a bad
idea. It's just what we've found to be the ea
9 matches
Mail list logo
