Christian Couder writes:
>
> I think sometimes the details might be interesting for different reasons.
> ...
> With the details, I think readers are more likely to remember the
> --merges option.
That unfortunately cuts both ways.
With too much details, the readers are more likely to skim and sk
Hi,
On 2015-07-08 12:29, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Michael J Gruber writes:
>>
>>> Just as an example, in the section on "visualizing merge diffs after the
>>> fact", few people will be interested in the detail that I pointed out
>>> the "
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael J Gruber writes:
>
>> Maybe a matter of taste, but I think in general we could do with a bit
>> less of "narrating" and more of "summarizing".
>
> True.
I think sometimes the details might be interesting for different reasons.
>> J
Michael J Gruber writes:
> Maybe a matter of taste, but I think in general we could do with a bit
> less of "narrating" and more of "summarizing".
True.
> Just as an example, in the section on "visualizing merge diffs after the
> fact", few people will be interested in the detail that I pointed
Eric Sunshine venit, vidit, dixit 06.07.2015 01:12:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, the non-ASCII characters
>>> in Duy's name got corrupted, and the botch is present in the patch I
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:54:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Eric Sunshine writes:
>> > How about this instead: prefixing with "As originally implemented",
>> > with a couple s/is/was/ thrown in...
>> >
>> > As originally implemente
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 10:54:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
> > How about this instead: prefixing with "As originally implemented",
> > with a couple s/is/was/ thrown in...
> >
> > As originally implemented, creation of linked-worktrees was
> > accomplished via
Eric Sunshine writes:
> How about this instead: prefixing with "As originally implemented",
> with a couple s/is/was/ thrown in...
>
> As originally implemented, creation of linked-worktrees was
> accomplished via `git checkout --to `, and cleanup
> of leftover administrative files,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>> I'm not familiar with the criteria for deciding what merits mention
>> in the newsletter. Is the recent introduction of git-worktree and the
>> attendant relocation of "add" and "prune" functionality worthy? If
>> s
Eric Sunshine writes:
> I'm not familiar with the criteria for deciding what merits mention
> in the newsletter. Is the recent introduction of git-worktree and the
> attendant relocation of "add" and "prune" functionality worthy? If
> so, perhaps the following write-up would be suitable?
One iss
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, the non-ASCII characters
>> in Duy's name got corrupted, and the botch is present in the patch I
>> sent. Sorry. Not sure how that happened. Can you fix it
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> Unfortunately, the non-ASCII characters
> in Duy's name got corrupted, and the botch is present in the patch I
> sent. Sorry. Not sure how that happened. Can you fix it locally?
Fixed [1].
[1]
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/commit/b5
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 01:13:57PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>>> A draft of Git Rev News edition 5 is available here:
>>> https://github.com/gi
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 01:13:57PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
>> A draft of Git Rev News edition 5 is available here:
>> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-5.md
>> Everyone is wel
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 01:13:57PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> A draft of Git Rev News edition 5 is available here:
> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-5.md
> Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section...
I'm not familiar with th
Hi,
A draft of Git Rev News edition 5 is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-5.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section, like Junio and
Matthieu already did, either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or
16 matches
Mail list logo
