On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Javier Domingo wrote:
>> Network, in this case is cheaper. The thing is that If I commit
>> frecuently, will have plenty of GBs of history, that nearly for sure I
>> won't use. I just need to have o
Javier,
Are you sure you need git for those big binary files at all?
Branching makes sense only if merging makes sense, and I can hardly see
how you can merge three 700-megabyte video files.
--
Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Javier Domingo wrote:
> Network, in this case is cheaper. The thing is that If I commit
> frecuently, will have plenty of GBs of history, that nearly for sure I
> won't use. I just need to have other people's work to merge. But I
> want to think in Git style, I am
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Javier Domingo wrote:
>
> I am currently planifying a 3D project, and I will be having large binary
> files. If I add a distributed VCS, the amount of disk space required will
> increase significantly.
You are going to transfer something that wont fit into your h
4 matches
Mail list logo
