Re: Binary grep t7008 known breakage vanished on Cygwin

2016-04-19 Thread Ramsay Jones
On 19/04/16 09:42, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:08:15PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: >> On 18/04/16 16:21, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: >>> t7008.12 is marked as an expected failure, but building Git on Cygwin >>> including a `make configure && ./configure` step has the test >>> unex

Re: Binary grep t7008 known breakage vanished on Cygwin

2016-04-19 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:08:15PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > On 18/04/16 16:21, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > t7008.12 is marked as an expected failure, but building Git on Cygwin > > including a `make configure && ./configure` step has the test > > unexpectedly passing. Building without the config

Re: Binary grep t7008 known breakage vanished on Cygwin

2016-04-18 Thread Ramsay Jones
On 18/04/16 16:21, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > t7008.12 is marked as an expected failure, but building Git on Cygwin > including a `make configure && ./configure` step has the test > unexpectedly passing. Building without the configure step has the test > failing as expected. > > This appears to be

Binary grep t7008 known breakage vanished on Cygwin

2016-04-18 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
t7008.12 is marked as an expected failure, but building Git on Cygwin including a `make configure && ./configure` step has the test unexpectedly passing. Building without the configure step has the test failing as expected. This appears to be behaviour specific to Cygwin; at least I get that test