Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Change old system name 'GIT' to 'Git'

2013-01-20 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Ackermann writes: >> If I were to decide today to change the spellings, with an explicit >> purpose of making things more consistent across documentation, it >> may make sense to use even a simpler rule that is less error-prone >> for people who write new sentences that has to have the wor

Aw: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Change old system name 'GIT' to 'Git'

2013-01-20 Thread Thomas Ackermann
> > If I were to decide today to change the spellings, with an explicit > purpose of making things more consistent across documentation, it > may make sense to use even a simpler rule that is less error-prone > for people who write new sentences that has to have the word. How > about treating it

Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Change old system name 'GIT' to 'Git'

2013-01-20 Thread Matthieu Moy
Thomas Ackermann writes: > The whole point of my patch is to use 'Git' consistently when > we are talking about the system and not the individual command. I like the idea. "git" should obviously remain lower-case when talking about the command, but deserves a capital when talking about the soft

Aw: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Change old system name 'GIT' to 'Git'

2013-01-19 Thread Thomas Ackermann
> > What about GITweb? > You are right; I missed that because I grepped only for 'GIT' as a whole word. 'gitweb' and 'GITweb' should be changed to 'Gitweb'. > > IMO some of these look nicer when everything is lowercase. > e.g. "standard git committer ident format". > IMHO what seems nicer he