Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-28 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > >Eric Wong wrote: > >> Which SVN version are you using?  I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) > >> https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and > >> unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M > >> (on a 32-bit system). > > > >git-svn hit 45M and to

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
-- On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 16:56 GMT Eric Wong wrote: >Eric Wong wrote: >> Which SVN version are you using?  I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) >> https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and >> unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M >> (on

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
-- On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 06:38 GMT Eric Wong wrote: >Which SVN version are you using?  I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) >https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and >unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M >(on a 32-bit system). > >I als

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Eric Wong
Eric Wong wrote: > Which SVN version are you using? I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) > https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and > unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M > (on a 32-bit system). git-svn hit 45M and took 11:44 to finish. My ping times to svn.

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-26 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote: > >0006 is insufficient and incompatible with older SVN. > >I pushed "git-svn: reload RA every log-window-size" > >(commit dfa72fdb96befbd790f623bb2909a347176753c2) instead > >which saves much more memory: > > it is fetching ag

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-25 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
-- On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote: >Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >> I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years >> and run "git svn fetch --all" every few days. So that's the old clone. >> Since this discussion started, I made a new one with

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-25 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote: > >Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > >> 0006-git-svn-clear-global-SVN-pool-between-get_log-invoca.patch > > > >0006 is insufficient and incompatible with older SVN. > >I pushed "git-svn: reload RA every log-window-size" > >(commit dfa

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-24 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years > and run "git svn fetch --all" every few days. So that's the old clone. > Since this discussion started, I made a new one with git 2.1.0 patched > with the first two patches below, a couple of weeks ago. And I ran >

Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-24 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years and run "git svn fetch --all" every few days. So that's the old clone. Since this discussion started, I made a new one with git 2.1.0 patched with the first two patches below, a couple of weeks ago. And I ran 'git svn fetch --all' on both e