Stefan Beller writes:
>>> Any better way of accomplishing this?
>>
>> "test && git branch -f last-good"?
>
> Travis-CI enabled, tells me they're using Github and are distributed,
> so one contributor would want to know the last known good state of
> a remote, that others push to, without testing
On March 11, 2016 1:08 PM Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Pedroso, Osiris" writes:
>
> > I participate in an open source project that any pull merge is accepted,
no
> matter what.
> >
> > This makes for lots of broken builds, even though we do have Travis-CI
> enabled on the project, because people will
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Pedroso, Osiris" writes:
>
>> I participate in an open source project that any pull merge is accepted, no
>> matter what.
>>
>> This makes for lots of broken builds, even though we do have Travis-CI
>> enabled on the project, because pe
"Pedroso, Osiris" writes:
> I participate in an open source project that any pull merge is accepted, no
> matter what.
>
> This makes for lots of broken builds, even though we do have Travis-CI
> enabled on the project, because people will merge a request before even the
> build is complete.
>
I participate in an open source project that any pull merge is accepted, no
matter what.
This makes for lots of broken builds, even though we do have Travis-CI enabled
on the project, because people will merge a request before even the build is
complete.
Therefore, I would like to remember the
5 matches
Mail list logo