Re: AW: Understanding behavior of git blame -M

2014-08-16 Thread David Kastrup
"Sokolov, Konstantin (ext)" writes: > Hi David, > > thank you very much for the exhaustive answer. The keyword "hunk" made > me try a little bit more. So I realized that -M works as expected when > at least three lines are moved. > > From your answer I discern that you find the current behavior >

AW: Understanding behavior of git blame -M

2014-08-15 Thread Sokolov, Konstantin (ext)
No. The distance seems to have no influence. In the meantime I've found out (as mentioned in my other reply) that the movements are detected if at least three lines are moved. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 15. August 2014 19:

AW: Understanding behavior of git blame -M

2014-08-15 Thread Sokolov, Konstantin (ext)
Hi David, thank you very much for the exhaustive answer. The keyword "hunk" made me try a little bit more. So I realized that -M works as expected when at least three lines are moved. >From your answer I discern that you find the current behavior correct. In my >opinion, it diverges at least