Thomas Rast writes:
> Lukas Fleischer writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:19:36AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> [...]
>>> $ git log --oneline --follow builtin/clone.c | wc -l
>>> 125
>>> $ git log --oneline --follow --reverse builtin/clone.c | wc -l
>>> 3
>>
>> I just wanted t
Am 5/24/2013 1:23, schrieb Alois Mahdal:
> ...query for when the file was really added,
> which I was trying to achieve with
>
> $ git -1 --reverse --follow several_times_renamed_file
Assuming you meant 'git log -1 ...' or similar. It won't do what you think
it would do because:
* -1 is a re
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:51:42AM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
> Lukas Fleischer writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:19:36AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> [...]
> >> $ git log --oneline --follow builtin/clone.c | wc -l
> >> 125
> >> $ git log --oneline --follow --reverse builtin/clo
Lukas Fleischer writes:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:19:36AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
[...]
>> $ git log --oneline --follow builtin/clone.c | wc -l
>> 125
>> $ git log --oneline --follow --reverse builtin/clone.c | wc -l
>> 3
>
> I just wanted to point out that it works fine whe
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:19:36AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:23:24AM +0200, Alois Mahdal wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This [has been reported][1] to this list about half a year ago
> > but with no response so I'm not even sure if it's been
> > acknowledged as bug.
> >
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:23:24AM +0200, Alois Mahdal wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This [has been reported][1] to this list about half a year ago
> but with no response so I'm not even sure if it's been
> acknowledged as bug.
>
> [1]: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=135215709307126&q=raw
>
> When I use `gi
Alois Mahdal wrote:
> This [has been reported][1] to this list about half a year ago
> but with no response so I'm not even sure if it's been
> acknowledged as bug.
Yes, this is a bug. However, it is not at all easy to fix; so I would
recommend that you contribute a documentation patch/ failing
On 2013-05-24 01:23, Alois Mahdal wrote:
[...]
When I use `git log --follow file` all is OK, but once I add
`--reverse` to it, it no longer follows the file beyond renames.
This makes it hard to query for when the file was really added,
which I was trying to achieve with
$ git -1 --reverse
Hello!
This [has been reported][1] to this list about half a year ago
but with no response so I'm not even sure if it's been
acknowledged as bug.
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=135215709307126&q=raw
When I use `git log --follow file` all is OK, but once I add
`--reverse` to it, it no longer f
9 matches
Mail list logo