Jonathan Tan writes:
> Currently, pack-objects conflates the concepts of "ignoring an object"
> and "including it in to_pack".
Hmph, that statement is a hard to read and agree to. I thought an
ignored object that is not going to be packed is one that won't hit
to_pack?
I agree that "includin
Currently, pack-objects conflates the concepts of "ignoring an object"
and "including it in to_pack". This is fine for now, but a subsequent
commit will introduce the concept of an object that cannot be completely
ignored, but should not be included in to_pack either. To separate these
concepts, re
2 matches
Mail list logo
