On Monday 20 August 2012 09:45:30 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Florian Achleitner wrote:
> > Currently, the mark number is equal to the svn revision number the commit
> > corresponds to. I didn't want to break that, but not mandatory. We could
> > also split the mark namespace by reserving one or more
Florian Achleitner wrote:
> Currently, the mark number is equal to the svn revision number the commit
> corresponds to. I didn't want to break that, but not mandatory. We could also
> split the mark namespace by reserving one or more of the most significant bits
> as a type specifier.
> I'll devel
On Sunday 19 August 2012 23:57:23 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Florian Achleitner writes:
> >> This change makes me uncomfortable.
> >> We are doubling up on hashing with fast-import.
> >> This introduces git-specific logic into vcs-svn.
>
> IIUC, vcs-svn/fast-export is meant to produce a stream in th
Florian Achleitner writes:
>> This change makes me uncomfortable.
>> We are doubling up on hashing with fast-import.
>> This introduces git-specific logic into vcs-svn.
IIUC, vcs-svn/fast-export is meant to produce a stream in the
fast-import format, and that format is meant to be VCS agnostic,
On Sunday 19 August 2012 04:37:35 David Michael Barr wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Florian Achleitner
>
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This patch series should prepare vcs-svn/svndump.* for branch
> > detection. When starting with this feature I found that the existing
> > functions are no
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Florian Achleitner
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch series should prepare vcs-svn/svndump.* for branch
> detection. When starting with this feature I found that the existing
> functions are not yet appropriate for that.
> These rewrites the node handling part of svndump
6 matches
Mail list logo
