Re: [RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation

2016-05-27 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Jordan DE GEA" We are working on full implementation of triangular workflow feature. For now, the main options available are: - branch..pushRemote - remote.pushDefault And only setable by hands. As it can be difficult to understand, here is what we want to do. Context: - One main remot

Re: [RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation

2016-05-26 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jordan DE GEA writes: > We are working on full implementation of triangular workflow feature. > For now, the main options available are: >- branch..pushRemote >- remote.pushDefault > And only setable by hands. And once it is set, you do not have to worry about it. I am not sur

Re: [RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation

2016-05-26 Thread Matthieu Moy
Jordan DE GEA writes: > Here is what we want to implement: Your message contains the word "implement" too many times. Before thinking about implementation, think, and discuss, about the design. If your message is intended to be a discussion on the design, then avoid using "implementation" in t

[RFC] Triangular Workflow: user friendly full implementation

2016-05-26 Thread Jordan DE GEA
We are working on full implementation of triangular workflow feature. For now, the main options available are: - branch..pushRemote - remote.pushDefault And only setable by hands. As it can be difficult to understand, here is what we want to do. Context: - One main r