On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:39:00 +, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>> Yes, this was my real concern. Eclipse users using EGit expect EGit to
>> be compatible with git-core at the filesystem level so they can do
>> something in EGit then switch to a shell
Karsten,
Thanks for your feedback!
On 03/11/2014 11:56 AM, Karsten Blees wrote:
> Am 10.03.2014 12:00, schrieb Michael Haggerty:
>>
>> Reference transactions --
>
> Very cool ideas indeed.
>
> However, I'm concerned a bit that transactions are conceptual
> overkill. How man
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:39:00 +, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> Yes, this was my real concern. Eclipse users using EGit expect EGit to
> be compatible with git-core at the filesystem level so they can do
> something in EGit then switch to a shell and bang out a command, or
> run a script provided by thei
Am 10.03.2014 12:00, schrieb Michael Haggerty:
>
> Reference transactions
> --
>
Very cool ideas indeed.
However, I'm concerned a bit that transactions are conceptual overkill. How
many concurrent updates do you expect in a repository? Wouldn't a single
repo-wide lock suff
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 04:52 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:45AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>>
* Store references in a SQLite database, to get correct transaction
handling.
>>>
>>> No to SQLLite in git-core. Using
On 03/10/2014 04:52 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:45AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>
>>> * Store references in a SQLite database, to get correct transaction
>>> handling.
>>
>> No to SQLLite in git-core. Using it from JGit requires building
>> SQLLite and a JNI wrapper, whi
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:14:02PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> [storing refs in sqlite]
>>
>> Of course, the basic premise for this feature is "let's assume that our
>> file and/or operating system suck at providing file system functionality
>> at file name granularity".
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:14:02PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> [storing refs in sqlite]
>
> Of course, the basic premise for this feature is "let's assume that our
> file and/or operating system suck at providing file system functionality
> at file name granularity". There have been two histori
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:46:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> No to SQLLite in git-core. Using it from JGit requires building
> >> SQLLite and a JNI wrapper, which makes JGit significantly less
> >> portable. I know SQLLite is pretty amazing, but implementing
> >> compatibility with it from
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:45AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>
>> > * Store references in a SQLite database, to get correct transaction
>> > handling.
>>
>> No to SQLLite in git-core. Using it from JGit requires building
>> SQLLite and a JNI wrapper, which makes JGit signi
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
Jeff King writes:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:45AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
* Store references in a SQLite database, to get correct transaction
handling.
No to SQLLite in git-core. Using it from JGit requires building
SQLLite and a JNI wrapp
Jeff King writes:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:45AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>
>> > * Store references in a SQLite database, to get correct transaction
>> > handling.
>>
>> No to SQLLite in git-core. Using it from JGit requires building
>> SQLLite and a JNI wrapper, which makes JGit signi
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:45AM -0700, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> > * Store references in a SQLite database, to get correct transaction
> > handling.
>
> No to SQLLite in git-core. Using it from JGit requires building
> SQLLite and a JNI wrapper, which makes JGit significantly less
> portable. I
On 10.03.2014, at 15:30, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Michael Haggerty
> wrote:
>> I have started working on pluggable ref backends. In this email I
>> would like to share my plans and solicit feedback.
>
> Yay!
Yay, too!
> JGit already has pluggable ref backends,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I have started working on pluggable ref backends. In this email I
> would like to share my plans and solicit feedback.
Yay!
JGit already has pluggable ref backends, so it is good to see this
starting in git-core.
FWIW the Gerrit Code R
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I have started working on pluggable ref backends. In this email I
> would like to share my plans and solicit feedback.
No comments or useful feedback yet, except that I enthusiastically
approve of the objective and the plan you have for
I have started working on pluggable ref backends. In this email I
would like to share my plans and solicit feedback.
(This morning I removed this project from the GSoC ideas page, because
it is unfair to ask a student to shoot at a moving target.)
Why?
Currently, the reference- and reflog-
17 matches
Mail list logo