Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] glossary: introduce glossary lookup command

2014-12-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael J Gruber writes: >> I wondered if we want to also have the associated documentation in >> response to a query, but I am not sure how well that would go >> without having a translated glossary at least. I.e. pulling the > > Yes, I think we would need something different then. The glossary

Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] glossary: introduce glossary lookup command

2014-12-11 Thread Michael J Gruber
Junio C Hamano schrieb am 10.12.2014 um 23:50: > Michael J Gruber writes: > >> When using a localised git, there are many reasons why a correspondence >> between English and localised git terms is needed: >> - connect localised messages with English ones (porcelain vs. plumbing) >> - connect loca

Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] glossary: introduce glossary lookup command

2014-12-10 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael J Gruber writes: > When using a localised git, there are many reasons why a correspondence > between English and localised git terms is needed: > - connect localised messages with English ones (porcelain vs. plumbing) > - connect localised messages with English man pages or online docs >

[RFC/PATCH 2/5] glossary: introduce glossary lookup command

2014-12-08 Thread Michael J Gruber
When using a localised git, there are many reasons why a correspondence between English and localised git terms is needed: - connect localised messages with English ones (porcelain vs. plumbing) - connect localised messages with English man pages or online docs - help out someone in a different loc