Kevin Bracey writes:
>> Could you explain here a bit more the reason why we do not want to
>> remove them and why "-s ours" is so significant that it deserves to
>> be singled out? And why randomly picking one that is redundant
>> (because it is an ancestor of some other parent) is an improvemen
On 28/04/2013 02:02, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kevin Bracey writes:
In the event of an odd merge, we may find ourselves TREESAME to
apparently redundant parents. Prevent simplify_merges() from removing
every TREESAME parent - in the event of such a merge it's useful to see
where we came actually f
Kevin Bracey writes:
> In the event of an odd merge, we may find ourselves TREESAME to
> apparently redundant parents. Prevent simplify_merges() from removing
> every TREESAME parent - in the event of such a merge it's useful to see
> where we came actually from came.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Bra
In the event of an odd merge, we may find ourselves TREESAME to
apparently redundant parents. Prevent simplify_merges() from removing
every TREESAME parent - in the event of such a merge it's useful to see
where we came actually from came.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey
---
Documentation/rev-list-o
4 matches
Mail list logo
