Junio C Hamano writes:
> Sergey Organov writes:
>
>>> Because rebasing immediately before is considered a bad manner,
>>> i.e. encouraging a wrong workflow?
>>
>> Why? What is wrong about it?
>
> Searching the kernel archive for messages that talks about "rebase"
> and "pull-request" from Linus
Sergey Organov writes:
>> Because rebasing immediately before is considered a bad manner,
>> i.e. encouraging a wrong workflow?
>
> Why? What is wrong about it?
Searching the kernel archive for messages that talks about "rebase"
and "pull-request" from Linus would tell us why it is frowned upon
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Sergey Organov writes:
>
>>> Why would it be useful to limit the history to a shape where all
>>> merges are the ones that could have been fast-forwarded?
>>
>> Except by true merge, how else can I express with git that 'n'
>> consequitive commits constitute single logic
Sergey Organov writes:
>> Why would it be useful to limit the history to a shape where all
>> merges are the ones that could have been fast-forwarded?
>
> Except by true merge, how else can I express with git that 'n'
> consequitive commits constitute single logical change (being originally
> som
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Sergey Organov writes:
>
>> This option allows to create merge commit when fast-forward is
>> possible, and abort otherwise. I.e. it's equivalent to --ff-only,
>> except that it finally creates merge commit instead of
>> fast-forwarding.
>>
>> One may also consider this
Sergey Organov writes:
> This option allows to create merge commit when fast-forward is
> possible, and abort otherwise. I.e. it's equivalent to --ff-only,
> except that it finally creates merge commit instead of
> fast-forwarding.
>
> One may also consider this option to be equivalent to --no-ff
This option allows to create merge commit when fast-forward is
possible, and abort otherwise. I.e. it's equivalent to --ff-only,
except that it finally creates merge commit instead of
fast-forwarding.
One may also consider this option to be equivalent to --no-ff with
additional check that the comm
7 matches
Mail list logo
