RE: [Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread Randall S. Becker
On June 13, 2019 3:31 PM, I wrote: > On June 13, 2019 3:07 PM, Peff wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:08PM -0400, randall.s.bec...@rogers.com > > wrote: > > > > > From: "Randall S. Becker" > > > > > > t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, > > > otherwise all of those

RE: [Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread Randall S. Becker
On June 13, 2019 3:07 PM, Peff wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:08PM -0400, randall.s.bec...@rogers.com > wrote: > > > From: "Randall S. Becker" > > > > t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, > > otherwise all of those tests fail. This patch follows an existing > > pa

Re: [Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:08PM -0400, randall.s.bec...@rogers.com wrote: > From: "Randall S. Becker" > > t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, otherwise > all of those tests fail. This patch follows an existing pattern of > from the t9400 series by attempting to run c

[Patch 0/5] Add exclusions for tests requiring cvs where cvs is not installed

2019-06-13 Thread randall . s . becker
From: "Randall S. Becker" t9600 to t9604 currently depend on cvs to function correctly, otherwise all of those tests fail. This patch follows an existing pattern of from the t9400 series by attempting to run cvs without arguments, which succeeds if installed, and skipping the test if the command