On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> Alternatively, we could add a new flag to get_worktrees() to tell it
>> to return all worktrees if there is a least one linked worktree, or
>> return NULL if there's only main worktree. I'm no
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> Alternatively, we could add a new flag to get_worktrees() to tell it
> to return all worktrees if there is a least one linked worktree, or
> return NULL if there's only main worktree. I'm not sure if this is
> clever or very stupid.
No, this may
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
> ---
> worktree.c | 24
> worktree.h | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
> index 75db689672..2559f33846 100644
> --- a/worktree.c
>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
---
worktree.c | 24
worktree.h | 7 +++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
index 75db689672..2559f33846 100644
--- a/worktree.c
+++ b/worktree.c
@@ -406,3 +406,27 @@ const struct worktree *find_shared
4 matches
Mail list logo