On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:48:58AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > Hmm. So that is a downside for people who have implemented separate
> > DoS protection only in that upgrading git will open a new "hole"
> > that they need to plug. But that is their problem, not upstream
> > git's.
> >
> > -Peff
>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> Jeff wrote:
>> > Junio wrote:
>> >> I think those extra knobs can come later. If we are not going to
>> >> limit with max_options in the end, however, wouldn't it be more
>> >>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
> > Junio wrote:
> >> I think those extra knobs can come later. If we are not going to
> >> limit with max_options in the end, however, wouldn't it be more
> >> natural for the initial iteration without any configuration
Jeff wrote:
> Junio wrote:
>> I think those extra knobs can come later. If we are not going to
>> limit with max_options in the end, however, wouldn't it be more
>> natural for the initial iteration without any configuration not to
>> have hard-coded max_options at all?
>
> Yeah, I am OK with addi
4 matches
Mail list logo
