Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Reroll of sb/submodule-merge-in-merge-recursive

2018-05-15 Thread Stefan Beller
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Leif Middelschulte wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > thank you once again for your effort. > > Am 15. Mai 2018 um 22:00:34, Stefan Beller > (sbel...@google.com(mailto:sbel...@google.com)) schrieb: > >> This rerolls the two commits found at [1] with the feedback of Eliah >

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Reroll of sb/submodule-merge-in-merge-recursive

2018-05-15 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Hello Stefan, thank you once again for your effort. Am 15. Mai 2018 um 22:00:34, Stefan Beller (sbel...@google.com(mailto:sbel...@google.com)) schrieb: > This rerolls the two commits found at [1] with the feedback of Eliah > and puts Leifs patch[2] on top, that I edited according to Eliahs feedb

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Reroll of sb/submodule-merge-in-merge-recursive

2018-05-15 Thread Stefan Beller
And I resent two of my earlier patches, please ignore those (0001-grep-handle-corrupt-index-files-early.patch and 0001-git-submodule.sh-try-harder-to-fetch-a-submodule.patch) Stefan

[PATCHv2 0/3] Reroll of sb/submodule-merge-in-merge-recursive

2018-05-15 Thread Stefan Beller
This rerolls the two commits found at [1] with the feedback of Eliah and puts Leifs patch[2] on top, that I edited according to Eliahs feedback, but kept Leifs ownership. This has addressed all of Eliahs feedback AFAICT. You'll find a branch-diff below[3], which lacks the new patch of Leif in tha