> On 04 Oct 2016, at 23:00, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
> [Some of answers and comments may got invalidated by v9]
>
> W dniu 30.09.2016 o 21:38, Lars Schneider pisze:
>>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 17:37, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>>>
>>> Part second of the review of 11/11.
> [...]
+
+ if (start_
> On 04 Oct 2016, at 22:50, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
> [Some of answers may get invalidated by v9]
>
> W dniu 30.09.2016 o 20:56, Lars Schneider pisze:
>>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 00:41, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>>>
+
+After the filter has processed a blob it is expected to wait for
+th
[Some of answers and comments may got invalidated by v9]
W dniu 01.10.2016 o 17:34, Lars Schneider pisze:
>> On 29 Sep 2016, at 01:14, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>>
>> Part third (and last) of the review of v8 11/11.
[...]
>>> +
>>> +test_expect_success PERL 'required process filter should filter dat
[Some of answers and comments may got invalidated by v9]
W dniu 30.09.2016 o 21:38, Lars Schneider pisze:
>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 17:37, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>>
>> Part second of the review of 11/11.
[...]
>>> +
>>> + if (start_command(process)) {
>>> + error("cannot fork to run extern
[Some of answers may get invalidated by v9]
W dniu 30.09.2016 o 20:56, Lars Schneider pisze:
>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 00:41, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>>
>> Part first of the review of 11/11.
[...]
>>> +to read a welcome response message ("git-filter-server") and exactly
>>> +one protocol version numbe
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 01:14, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
> Part third (and last) of the review of v8 11/11.
>
> W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com napisał:
>
>
>> @@ -31,7 +31,10 @@ test_expect_success setup '
>> cat test >test.i &&
>> git add test test.t test.i &&
>>
> On 27 Sep 2016, at 17:37, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
> Part second of the review of 11/11.
>
> W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
>
>> +
>> +if (!drv->process && (CAP_CLEAN & wanted_capability) && drv->clean)
>
> This is just a very minor nitpicking, but wouldn't it
> On 27 Sep 2016, at 00:41, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>
> Part first of the review of 11/11.
>
> W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
>> From: Lars Schneider
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
>> b/Documentation/gitattributes.txt
>> index 7aff940..946dcad 10
Part third (and last) of the review of v8 11/11.
W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com napisał:
[...]
> diff --git a/contrib/long-running-filter/example.pl
> b/contrib/long-running-filter/example.pl
> new file mode 100755
> index 000..c13a631
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/contrib/long
Part second of the review of 11/11.
W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> diff --git a/contrib/long-running-filter/example.pl
> b/contrib/long-running-filter/example.pl
> new file mode 100755
> index 000..c13a631
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/contrib/long-running-filter/exam
Part first of the review of 11/11.
W dniu 20.09.2016 o 21:02, larsxschnei...@gmail.com pisze:
> From: Lars Schneider
>
> Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for
> every single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of
> blobs then the startup time of
From: Lars Schneider
Git's clean/smudge mechanism invokes an external filter process for
every single blob that is affected by a filter. If Git filters a lot of
blobs then the startup time of the external filter processes can become
a significant part of the overall Git execution time.
In a prel
12 matches
Mail list logo
