From: "Johannes Schindelin"
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Philip Oakley wrote:
From: "Johannes Schindelin" : Monday, April
23,
2018 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/16] sequencer: introduce the `merge` command
[...]
>
> > > label onto
> > >
> > > #
Hi Martin,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Martin Ågren wrote:
> On 23 April 2018 at 17:54, Phillip Wood wrote:
> > I'm fine with leaving it, I've might get round to doing a small series to
> > clean things up slightly in a few weeks. At the moment
> > setup_unpack_trees_porcelain() leaks memory as it is c
Hi Philip,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Johannes Schindelin" : Monday, April 23,
> 2018 1:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/16] sequencer: introduce the `merge` command
>
> [...]
> >
> > > > label onto
> > > >
>
Hi Phillip,
On 23 April 2018 at 17:54, Phillip Wood wrote:
> I'm fine with leaving it, I've might get round to doing a small series to
> clean things up slightly in a few weeks. At the moment
> setup_unpack_trees_porcelain() leaks memory as it is called for each merge
> and allocates new strings
From: "Johannes Schindelin" : Monday, April 23,
2018 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/16] sequencer: introduce the `merge` command
Hi Philip,
[...]
> label onto
>
> # Branch abc
> reset onto
Is this reset strictly necessary. We are already there @head.
No
On 23/04/18 13:20, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi Phillip,
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
On 21/04/18 11:33, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
Gi
Hi Phillip,
On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 21/04/18 16:56, Phillip Wood wrote:
> > On 21/04/18 11:33, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >> This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
> >> a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in t
Hi Phillip,
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 21/04/18 11:33, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
> > a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
> > Git for Windows project to maintain th
Hi Philip,
On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Johannes Schindelin"
> > This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
> > a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
> > Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windo
On 21/04/18 16:56, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 21/04/18 11:33, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
>> a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
>> Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windows
From: "Johannes Schindelin"
This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windows-specific patch
series on top of upstream Git.
The previous patc
From: "Johannes Schindelin"
This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windows-specific patch
series on top of upstream Git.
The previous patc
On 21/04/18 11:33, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windows-specific patch
series on top of upstream Git.
This patch is part of the effort to reimplement `--preserve-merges` with
a substantially improved design, a design that has been developed in the
Git for Windows project to maintain the dozens of Windows-specific patch
series on top of upstream Git.
The previous patch implemented the `label` and `
14 matches
Mail list logo
