On 12/05, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> From: Jeff Hostetler
>
I'm a fan of eliminating looping goto statements. I understand their
need for doing cleanup, but I think they should be reserved for that
specific case. Thanks for cleaning this up!
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler
> ---
> sha1_file.c
On 12/5/2017 3:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff Hostetler writes:
From: Jeff Hostetler
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler
---
sha1_file.c | 40
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
The second (i.e. this) part and the third part are no
Jeff Hostetler writes:
> + while (1) {
> + if (find_pack_entry(real, &e))
> + break;
>
> + /* Most likely it's a loose object. */
> + if (!sha1_loose_object_info(real, oi, flags))
> + return 0;
>
> + /
Jeff Hostetler writes:
> From: Jeff Hostetler
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler
> ---
> sha1_file.c | 40
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
The second (i.e. this) part and the third part are not yet in
'next', so it will perfectly be
From: Jeff Hostetler
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler
---
sha1_file.c | 40
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
index fc7718a..ce67f27 100644
--- a/sha1_file.c
+++ b/sha1_file.c
@@ -1180,30 +1180,30 @@ i
5 matches
Mail list logo